![]() |
Idaho Transportation Department |
![]() |
|
||||||
![]() |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Advisory Boards And CommitteesBoard HomeBoard MembersMeeting Schedule & AgendasMeeting MinutesDirector's Board ReportSubcommittee on Adjustments to State Highway SystemITD Executive TeamContact Information ![]() |
Idaho Transportation State Highway System Adjustments December 14, 2011 Idaho Transportation
Board Subcommittee on State Highway System Adjustments Chairman Gary Blick and Transportation
Board Members Lee Gagner, Jim Coleman, and Jerry Whitehead met at 2:10 PM on Wednesday,
December 14, 2011 at the Idaho Transportation Department, Boise, Idaho. Chief
Engineer Tom Cole, Deputy Attorney General (DAG) Larry Allen, Executive
Assistant to the Board Sue Higgins, District 3 Engineer (DE) Dave Jones, and
Planning and Support staff members Sonna Lynn Fernandez and Mary Lockwood were
also present. DE1 Damon Allen participated in the first topic via video
conference. Proposed
Relinquishment of Coeur d’Alene Lake Drive, District 1. Member Coleman reported that efforts to relinquish old US-10, Coeur
d’Alene Lake Drive, to the City of Coeur d’Alene are proceeding. Ownership of
the various properties along the route has been identified and staff is
preparing a conveyance package. Member Gagner asked
about ITD’s responsibilities after the road is transferred. DE1 Allen replied
that issues related to I-90 would be the state’s responsibility. Member Coleman
added that ITD’s responsibility is basically from I-90 down to the bottom of
the slope. Member Coleman said
the city would like jurisdiction of the road and is exploring a land trade with
the Hagdone Corporation to construct a boat ramp. Chairman Blick reiterated the
desire to keep the road and property in the public’s hands. He asked if the
road could revert back to ITD if the city no longer wants it in the future. DAG
Allen replied yes, language to that effect could be incorporated into the
agreement with the exception of Higgins Point. That property belongs to the
Idaho Department of Parks and Recreation. Member Gagner made a
motion authorizing DE1 Allen to proceed with the negotiations. Member Coleman
seconded the motion and it passed 3-0 with Chairman Blick and Members Coleman
and Gagner voting in the affirmative. Chairman Blick added that this issue
needs to be brought back to the Subcommittee. Local Highway
Technical Assistance Council Deputy Administrator Jeff Miles joined the meeting
at this time. Proposed
Relinquishment of US-95 Spur, Payette, District 3. DE3 Jones said the City of Payette is
interested in assuming jurisdiction of the US-95 Spur in Payette. In exchange,
ITD would fund a traffic signal at the US-95 and SH-52 intersection. The
estimated cost of the signal is $200,000. He added that the city has done some
preliminary work on the traffic signal. DE3 Jones believes he has funding
available from savings that could be used to construct the signal. Chairman Blick
commended DE3 Jones for the innovative approach, as it is the Subcommittee’s
desire to relinquish routes that do not function as state highways. The general
consensus was for DE3 Jones to proceed with finalizing the proposal to fund the
traffic signal in exchange for the relinquishment of the US-95 Spur in Payette
to the City of Payette. The Subcommittee is to review the agreement prior to
taking it to the full Board for consideration. US-95,
Council Alternate Route, District 3. DE3 Jones said
the US-95, Council Alternate Route project is in the Statewide Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP). He is planning to pursue negotiations with the city
to relinquish the old highway after the alternate route has been completed. The
existing highway would be improved before it is transferred to Council. He said
those improvements would be incorporated into the design of the alternate route
project. The consensus of the
Subcommittee was for DE3 Jones to proceed: negotiate with the City of Council
and come back to the Subcommittee. US-2 Curve,
Sandpoint, District 1.
Member Coleman reported that District 1 and the City of Sandpoint have entered
into a memorandum of understanding for ITD to relinquish US-95 and US-2 in
Sandpoint to the city upon completion of the US-95, Sandpoint Byway project and
the US-2 Curve project. Vice Chairman Blick
expressed support for District 1’s efforts, as the routes to be relinquished
will no longer function as state highways upon completion of the US-95 and US-2
construction projects. Member Whitehead believes
SH-55, Eagle Road, should be removed from the state system upon completion of
the extension of SH-16 south. I-84 Business,
Caldwell, District 3. DE3
Jones said the City of Caldwell is planning to widen a half-mile stretch of
US-20, from Aviation Way east. Although the improvements would be on the state
system, the city is planning to pay for them because it believes the
improvements would provide economic opportunities. DE3 Jones has had
preliminary discussions with city officials regarding ITD making additional
improvements to US-20 if Caldwell would assume jurisdiction of I-84 Business. The
Business route is approximately eight miles. He received a favorable response
and plans to pursue that proposal. A portion of the Business route is in poor
shape; however, the District has a project in the STIP to make some
improvements. DE3 Jones believes he would need approximately $10-12 million to
make the necessary improvements that would result in the city assuming
jurisdiction of I-84B. New
Business – I-84 Business, Nampa, District 3. DE3 Jones
reported on a very recent discussion with City of Nampa officials regarding
I-84 Business in Nampa. The city is interested in realigning SH-45 in downtown
Nampa, which currently dead ends at I-84B, to connect with old SH-55 on Nampa
Boulevard at I-84 Exit 35. The estimated cost is $20 million; however, the City
of Nampa would assume jurisdiction of I-84B. Chairman Blick
expressed support for the two I-84 Business proposals. He encouraged DE3 Jones
to pursue negotiations, but cautioned against making commitments, as funding is
a concern. DE3 Jones responded that he assumes he would fund the projects from
money within his district. Chairman Blick believes savings from elsewhere in
the department should be considered, as he supports eliminating mileage from
the state system. Member Coleman added
that the maintenance costs for routes such as I-84B add up. ITD spends
approximately $80,000 for maintenance on Coeur d’Alene Lake Drive annually,
plus occasional projects like seal coats. The consensus of the
Subcommittee was for DE3 Jones to pursue negotiations with the Cities of
Caldwell and Nampa on I-84 Business and report back to the Subcommittee. Chairman Blick commended DE3 Jones’s
initiative and encouraged him to share these innovative proposals with the
other District Engineers. Both Chairman Blick
and Member Gagner supported looking statewide for funding, including shifting
projects in the STIP to fund transactions when locals are willing to assume
state highways. Member Coleman added that if a proposal makes good economic and
operations sense, the Board should find a way to fund it. The meeting
adjourned at 3:00 PM. ________signed________________ Respectfully
submitted by: SUE S. HIGGINS Executive Assistant
& Secretary Idaho Transportation
Board
|